There are reports that Jonathan Papelbon could be on the move soon. A closer making $13M a year is a luxury item that a team without reasonable postseason hopes like the Phillies has no business employing. Unfortunately, the Phillies didn’t foresee the rapidity of their decline into irrelevance when they signed Papelbon to a 4-year/$50M contract in 2011 — the largest contract ever for a relief pitcher — which has left them unwittingly stuck with a player and contract that doesn’t mesh with their rebuilding goals.
The decision to trade Papelbon should be an easy one then, right? The Phillies don’t need him, he engages in inappropriate crotch grabs, and at age 34 with decreasing velo, his decline could arrive like a baby to a 9-month pregnant woman — any day now. Of course, if GM’ing were that simple anyone could do it. *insert Amaro joke here* *think to self, “gosh, self, that was a good one”* *wait for the laughter to die down* In reality, there are actual drawbacks to moving Papelbon. Do the cons outweigh the pros? Maybe not, but let’s at least think about the move from all angles before asserting it’s a no-brainer